Have you
ever had somebody walk up to you at work, grinning away manically, and you just
think “what do you want from me?” I have been pondering some concurrent
phenomena, modern management techniques and systemic infantilsation.
It is a
shame, in a way, that there are so many socialists who become teachers or
lecturers. Not because the teaching profession shouldn’t be organised or that
socialist teachers can’t open minds or make a difference in young people’s
lives. Unfortunately the primary product of the education system is not
knowledge (if it is tell me all you remember of trigonometry or irregular
French verbs – these are just examples). The primary product is habit and
deference, and these things are instilled despite the best intentions of the
best teachers. That’s why we have an education system.
Why do
managers who want to coerce a single individual shut them away in a small room?
Why do managers who want to railroad a self-conscious group of workers gather
the workers together and present their plans in a faux-democratic manner,
called consultation? These are techniques used on people from the age of five.
Hierarchical
authority relies on dependence and passivity. It relies on the inner child.
Even at the best of times it is very hard to shake your formative education.
This is a key aspect in why during revolutions without even realising it people
given back what they have won. They cannot imagine a world without managers,
bureaucrats, elected politicians, police officers etc, who in normal times they
rely on.
It’s is
the commonly considered theory that human beings evolved because they were
neotenic apes, they preserved juvenile features into maturity. If social management depends infantilisation there is now a worrying trend of
preserving social aspects of childhood into adulthood; middle youth, helicopter parenting. They're impressionistic examples, not to cast aspersions on anybody. We are not seeing a moral
breakdown so much as describing facts. Here is an article written on the eve of
the great crash weighing up the work prospects of Generation Y, who according
to this are needy, moralistic, tech-dependent and crave formal structure and
personal affirmation. With declining workforce numbers the author advises managers to get with
Generation Y’s programme. Of course with mass youth unemployment these days
bosses don’t have worry anymore. Young people, especially those on the
government’s work programme (3.5% overall ‘success’ rate ), are even more dependent on the graces of the rich and powerful.
No comments:
Post a Comment